<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>The Intangible Economy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2011-09-02:/weblog//1</id>
    <updated>2012-05-15T12:51:55Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Athena Alliance&apos;s weblog of insights and information
on the I-Cubed (Information, Innovation, Intangible) Economy</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 5.12</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Thoughts on the JOBS Act and policy experimentation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/thoughts-on-the-jobs-act.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4109</id>

    <published>2012-05-15T12:50:48Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-15T12:51:55Z</updated>

    <summary>The recently passed JOBS Act continues to draw commentary. Below is a sampling of some of the various views (some old, some new). Frankly, I remain skeptical of both the praise and dispraise. As I noted before, JOBS Act should...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The recently passed JOBS Act continues to draw commentary.  Below is a sampling of some of the various views (some old, some new).  Frankly, I remain skeptical of both the praise and dispraise.  As <a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/embarking-on-a-regulatory-experiment-jobs-act.html">I noted before</a>, JOBS Act should be viewed as a regulatory experiment.  The SEC is in process of writing the guidelines to implement that Act.  I am sure that all sides of the debate will be weighing in on these regulations.  As that process moves forward, there is an opportunity for the entrepreneurial community to step up and change the way Washington (and government in general) works.  Think of the Act as a start-up.  Let's create some new mechanisms for measuring success and for learning from (and correcting the problems created by) any failures.  That, in and of itself, would be a major accomplishment.</p>

<p>HBR Blog: two sides:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/04/the_road_to_crowdfunding_hell.html">The Road to Crowdfunding Hell</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2012/05/crowdfunding_is_a_critical_res.html">Don't Abandon Crowdfunding -- Manage It</a></p>

<p>NY Times Deal Professor: <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/from-congress-a-law-befitting-a-sausage-factory">From Congress, a Law Befitting a Sausage Factory</a>.</p>

<p>Fast Company: <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/1826929/the-jobs-act-misconceptions-motives-crowdfunding-for-startups">The JOBS Act: Misconceptions And Motives Behind Crowdfunding For Startups</a> </p>

<p>ComputerWorld: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9225903/Tech_chief_says_JOBS_Act_renews_faith_in_Washington_?source=rss_latest_content&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+computerworld%2Fnews%2Ffeed+%28Latest+from+Computerworld%29">Tech chief says JOBS Act 'renews faith' in Washington</a></p>

<p>Wall Street Journal: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304072004577325883892874036.html">Investors' Prying Eyes Blinded by New Law</a></p>

<p>TIME: <a href="http://business.time.com/2012/04/06/the-jobs-act-signing-a-giant-step-for-entrepreneurship-in-america">The JOBS Act Signing: A Giant Step for Entrepreneurship in America</a></p>

<p><br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Select Tweets 5/7/12-5/13/12</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/select-tweets-5712-51312.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4152</id>

    <published>2012-05-14T20:20:34Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-14T20:39:52Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[NY, Mass, Oregon in bottom 10 places to do biz In Chief Exec mag survey, but are in top 10 for economic growth on.wsj.com/KrIUT2&mdash; David Wessel (@davidmwessel) May 7, 2012 Socialism isn't the answer but neither is the status quo....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>NY, Mass, Oregon in bottom 10 places to do biz In Chief Exec mag survey, but are in top 10 for economic growth <a href="http://t.co/gsCQlSra" title="http://on.wsj.com/KrIUT2">on.wsj.com/KrIUT2</a></p>&mdash; David Wessel (@davidmwessel) <a href="https://twitter.com/davidmwessel/status/199472902221987841" data-datetime="2012-05-07T12:17:00+00:00">May 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Socialism isn't the answer but neither is the status quo. The case for fundamental reform of capitalism. <a href="http://t.co/2vDW36qI" title="http://robertreich.org/post/22542609387">robertreich.org/post/225426093...</a></p>&mdash; Robert Reich (@RBReich) <a href="https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/199553676774350848" data-datetime="2012-05-07T17:37:58+00:00">May 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>How Much "Mad Men" Paid for The Beatles <a href="http://t.co/wxhZz1ri" title="http://on.wsj.com/ISSxa8">on.wsj.com/ISSxa8</a> 5X typical cost oflicense, according to WSJ.New bubble in song licenses?</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/199613695897247746" data-datetime="2012-05-07T21:36:28+00:00">May 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Travel agents are back from the dead <a href="http://t.co/eyJisrX3" title="http://ti.me/KDqYT4">ti.me/KDqYT4</a> With an overwhelming number of choices, agents serve as information brokers.</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/199615012359241728" data-datetime="2012-05-07T21:41:42+00:00">May 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Is regulatory uncertainty freezing the business sector? <a href="http://t.co/yyGymd6B" title="http://bit.ly/Iyg3Lm">bit.ly/Iyg3Lm</a></p>&mdash; Jared Bernstein (@econjared) <a href="https://twitter.com/econjared/status/199572360406368256" data-datetime="2012-05-07T18:52:13+00:00">May 7, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>As Klein notes, it shouldn't be short term v. long term. Both are needed to create a robust economy. <a href="http://t.co/GG1OmpMF" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/larry-summers-vs-the-long-termers/2012/05/07/gIQAEIyv8T_story.html?wpisrc=nl_wonk">washingtonpost.com/business/econo...</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/199891594621628417" data-datetime="2012-05-08T16:00:44+00:00">May 8, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Locating American Manufacturing: Trends in the Geography of Production <a href="http://t.co/CpntXqB9" title="http://brookin.gs/4lZw">brookin.gs/4lZw</a> via @<a href="https://twitter.com/BrookingsInst">BrookingsInst</a>Full report from Brookings</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200252531069300737" data-datetime="2012-05-09T15:54:58+00:00">May 9, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Disney may be on to something <a href="http://t.co/NGNCJNF3" title="http://wapo.st/IS3Rn3">wapo.st/IS3Rn3</a> Advances in touch sensitive tech may end up changing how we interact with objects</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200334563598286848" data-datetime="2012-05-09T21:20:56+00:00">May 9, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>When a mark is really a mark (trademark) <a href="http://t.co/gvr1h24M" title="http://on.wsj.com/IJkySk">on.wsj.com/IJkySk</a> Red wax seal on Maker's Mark is a protected "trade dress" (form of trademark)</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200340133382332416" data-datetime="2012-05-09T21:43:04+00:00">May 9, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p><a href="http://t.co/1WOraPJW" title="http://on.wsj.com/IOtlGi">on.wsj.com/IOtlGi</a> Kauffman Foundation Bashes VCs For Poor Performance, Urges LPs To Take Charge</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200600624210001921" data-datetime="2012-05-10T14:58:10+00:00">May 10, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>BVR IP Blog on the strange Oracle v. Google jury finding<a href="http://t.co/nQZuIKET" title="http://www.ipvalue-site.com/index.php/2012/05/09/jury-returns-illogical-verdict-in-part-one-of-oracle-v-google/">ipvalue-site.com/index.php/2012...</a> Was it all due to the judge's instructions?</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200608972330385408" data-datetime="2012-05-10T15:31:20+00:00">May 10, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>RT @<a href="https://twitter.com/BrookingsMetro">BrookingsMetro</a>: <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523Manufacturing">#Manufacturing</a> is not just another industry, it has an essential role in the next economy <a href="http://t.co/50Ih2C1e" title="http://goo.gl/h3yEx">goo.gl/h3yEx</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523usmfg">#usmfg</a></p>&mdash; Brookings (@BrookingsInst) <a href="https://twitter.com/BrookingsInst/status/200648307498942464" data-datetime="2012-05-10T18:07:39+00:00">May 10, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>RT @<a href="https://twitter.com/grossdm">grossdm</a>: The Economist magazine nods at Better, Stronger, Faster in a larger piece about u.s. optimism/decline <a href="http://t.co/lKh0gkhR" title="http://econ.st/KdfZol">econ.st/KdfZol</a></p>&mdash; Philip Auerswald (@auerswald) <a href="https://twitter.com/auerswald/status/200680055733620736" data-datetime="2012-05-10T20:13:48+00:00">May 10, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Future of cities and universities <a href="http://t.co/XEXfS7UF" title="http://www.slideshare.net/mobile/spohrer/japan-may-11-future-of-cities-and-universities-20120511-v3">slideshare.net/mobile/spohrer...</a> a service science perspective</p>&mdash; Jim Spohrer (@JimSpohrer) <a href="https://twitter.com/JimSpohrer/status/200810474806329347" data-datetime="2012-05-11T04:52:02+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>The Case for Global Accounting <a href="http://t.co/ENDHXR6m" title="http://nyti.ms/IXX28S">nyti.ms/IXX28S</a> And those standards need to account for intangibles otherwise they are misleading.</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200945482443403265" data-datetime="2012-05-11T13:48:31+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Cashing in on a national intangible: National Travel and TourismStrategy <a href="http://t.co/J0l9JoyE" title="http://on.doi.gov/LprXcq">on.doi.gov/LprXcq</a> Tout "Brand USA" but also make process better</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200985144830590976" data-datetime="2012-05-11T16:26:07+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Why Publishers Don't Like Apps <a href="http://t.co/YoZbOQCx" title="http://techre.vu/J3K62t">techre.vu/J3K62t</a> (via @<a href="https://twitter.com/TechReview">TechReview</a>) The apps revolution is far from over - it is just beginning ...</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200987187083350016" data-datetime="2012-05-11T16:34:14+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>... one issue: iTunes fees eat up all the publishers profit margin.Another: its just not like the web yet.<a href="http://t.co/xUW5wMay" title="http://techre.vu/J3Kj5P">techre.vu/J3Kj5P</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200987639594229760" data-datetime="2012-05-11T16:36:02+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias">mattyglesias</a>: Weekly Standard on "Orwellian" ACSurvey: <a href="http://t.co/iiEQAzw5" title="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/orwellian-american-community-survey">weeklystandard.com/blogs/orwellia...</a> Less data results in better policy? That is "Orwellian"</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/200991172498423809" data-datetime="2012-05-11T16:50:04+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/KauffmanFDN">KauffmanFDN</a>: [Growthology] Put Away the Axes: <a href="http://t.co/aaAlSuQ1" title="http://t.co/">t.co</a> Amen! Cutting statistical agencies is destroying an intangible asset</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/201014564077322240" data-datetime="2012-05-11T18:23:01+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Has America lost its competitive edge? See what Jan Rivkin from @<a href="https://twitter.com/HBSNews">HBSNews</a> has to say: <a href="http://t.co/rzUXjwXj" title="http://shar.es/2Keqa">shar.es/2Keqa</a></p>&mdash; PAGE (@PAGEeconomy) <a href="https://twitter.com/PAGEeconomy/status/201033528551555074" data-datetime="2012-05-11T19:38:22+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Here's a nice discussion of the ideas in Race Against the Machine. <a href="http://t.co/i0lRD464" title="http://venturebeat.com/2012/05/11/work-with-the-machine-not-against-it/#.T614cMVuMJY.twitter">venturebeat.com/2012/05/11/wor...</a></p>&mdash; Erik Brynjolfsson (@erikbryn) <a href="https://twitter.com/erikbryn/status/201049060319305728" data-datetime="2012-05-11T20:40:05+00:00">May 11, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>"@<a href="https://twitter.com/JimSpohrer">JimSpohrer</a>: The top majors of 2022 <a href="http://t.co/MnCddyqm" title="http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2012/05/09/the-top-majors-for-the-class-of-2022/2/">forbes.com/sites/alexknap...</a> no surprises, but entertaining short read".And not all are in 'tech'</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/201720536294895616" data-datetime="2012-05-13T17:08:18+00:00">May 13, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>A Future Without Key Social and Economic Statistics ... <a href="http://t.co/lQfvn1aG" title="http://bit.ly/JjuAzk">bit.ly/JjuAzk</a></p>&mdash; Daniel Pink (@DanielPink) <a href="https://twitter.com/DanielPink/status/201686479829860352" data-datetime="2012-05-13T14:52:58+00:00">May 13, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<p><br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Insights on intangibles in small manufacturing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/insights-on-intangibles-in-small-manufacturing.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4151</id>

    <published>2012-05-11T15:54:53Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-11T16:09:39Z</updated>

    <summary>Yesterday and today, the NY Times blog &quot;You&apos;re the Boss&quot; blog had pieces by a small furniture manufacturer (Paul Downs of Paul Downs Cabinetmakers) about his look at German manufacturing (&quot;I Have Seen the Future of Manufacturing&quot; Part 1 and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yesterday and today, the NY Times blog "You're the Boss" blog had pieces by a small furniture manufacturer (Paul Downs of Paul Downs Cabinetmakers) about his look at German manufacturing ("I Have Seen the Future of Manufacturing" <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/i-have-seen-the-future-of-manufacturing">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/i-have-seen-the-future-of-manufacturing-part-2">Part 2</a>).  What I found especially interesting were the comments that reveled the importance of intangible assets in manufacturing (a point we made in an Athena Alliance Policy Brief--<a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/pdf/ICandManufacturingFramework.pdf"><em>Intellectual Capital and Revitalizing Manufacturing</em></a>).</p>

<p>In <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/i-have-seen-the-future-of-manufacturing">Part 1</a> of the piece, there was this setup comment on the linkage between design and production:<blockquote>I have done wholesaling in the past. It worked best when we were allowed to design the work, which ensured that we could produce it efficiently.</blockquote> </p>

<p>Then, there was this about the importance of localized knowledge:<blockquote>We were asked to design variations on some of their existing products that would work better in the American market. In particular, they were finding that their existing table-base designs didn't work well with American wiring. The semirandom placement of floor boxes that is so typical of American construction often missed the small openings in the bottom of their bases. Apparently, German electricians are better at putting the plugs where the plans specify. That's a problem we deal with daily, and it didn't take long for me to design a new base style to go with one of the company's existing top designs.</blockquote></p>

<p>So in <a href="http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/11/i-have-seen-the-future-of-manufacturing-part-2">Part 2</a> he goes off to visit the German factory as part of this new project.  There he comments on the vacuum lifters on the shop floor, "These are special machines that allow a single person to take a heavy panel off a cart and load it into a machine." (A <a href="http://video.nytimes.com/video/2012/05/10/business/100000001535755/vacuum-lifter-in-action.html">video is included in the article</a>). <blockquote>The lifters made it possible for a single person to load and unload machines, and they probably cut down on injuries as well. The profusion of these lifters was emblematic of the way the plant was laid out in general. Wherever possible, tasks were arranged in such a way that machines do as much work as possible. Not that this was an assembly line -- the things that couldn't be done by machine required hand skills or human judgment. The workers weren't drones or button-pushers. They handled complex tasks that take years to master.</blockquote>Three intangibles here: "In each area, skilled workers were surrounded by fantastic machinery in a spotless, logically arranged factory."  </p>

<p>But he adds a very important caveat on the new machinery, specifically the lifters -- that they might be useful only in limited circumstances.  Even more interesting was this insight:<blockquote>It's also worth noting that machines don't ever think of new ways to do the work. They provide no opportunity for fruitful interaction between the shop floor and the engineers -- information flows only one way in an automated process. And they change the atmosphere within the company. They don't help each other and create a fellowship of workers mastering difficult tasks. They don't say hello, or ask about the wife and kids, or bring in cookies, or tell a joke, or go back to their town and coach a Little League team. One of the things I like best about owning a factory is the atmosphere created by a group of skilled, congenial people doing great work together. The machines we do have definitely help us make this happen, but there may be a tipping point where they start to suck the life out of the shop floor.</blockquote></p>

<p>Here is a key insight that get often overlooked -- especially in manufacturing that has been driven by the Taylorist/Fordist model for a century.  <em>The knowledge of the front line workforce and the flow of information among the workers and engineers is critical</em>.</p>

<p>So to recap, the articles highlight a number of intangible assets:<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Link between design and production<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Localized knowledge of customer needs<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Skilled workers<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Advanced machinery (and the knowledge embedded therein)<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Logically arranged factory<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&bull;&nbsp;Information flows among all levels of the workforce</p>

<p>Many kudos to Mr. Downs for both understanding the role of intangibles (although he probably doesn't use that term) and for illustrating them for the rest of us to better understand.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>March trade in intangibles</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/march-trade-in-intangibles-3.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4149</id>

    <published>2012-05-10T13:25:53Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-10T13:28:46Z</updated>

    <summary>This morning&apos;s release of the March trade data from BEA was not good news. The deficit rose sharply by $6.4 billion to $51.8 billion. Exports increased by $5.3 billion in March but imports surged by $11.7 billion. The deficits in...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This morning's release of the <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/trade/2012/pdf/trad0312.pdf">March trade data from BEA</a> was not good news.  The deficit rose sharply by $6.4 billion to $51.8 billion.  Exports increased by $5.3 billion in March but imports surged by $11.7 billion.  The deficits in both petroleum and non-petroleum goods increased.  But while some of the increase in the deficit is due to higher oil prices (and imports), the deficit grew much more in the non-petroleum goods.  Both capital goods and consumer goods saw significant jumps in imports and auto related imports reached a record high.</p>

<p>In some good news, the trade surplus in intangibles continued to grow in March, increasing by $173 million to $14.119 billion.  Imports and exports increased for both royalty payments and business services, with exports rising faster than import in both categories.  As I noted last month, the trade surplus in business services had declined in the Nov-Jan time period.  So, the continued increase in the business services surplus is especially good news.  However, we must continue to remember that the intangibles surplus is a fraction of the goods deficit.  The size of the goods deficit is 4.8X the size of the intangibles surplus.  The increase in the goods deficit was almost 60X the increase in the intangibles surplus.  If we are to bring trade back to a more balanced position, we cannot rely solely on trade in intangibles.  We must use our advantage in intangibles to the strengthen the competitive position of our goods manufacturers and thereby both increase exports and reduce imports.</p>

<p>Symptomatic of the challenge we face in knowledge (intangibles) intensive goods is that fact that the deficit in Advanced Technology Products also shot up in March to $7.2 billion.  The decline was due almost exclusively to a $3.8 billion  surge in information and communications technology (ICT) imports -- which swamped increases in aerospace and ICT exports.  The last monthly surplus in Advanced Technology Products was in June 2002 and the last sustained series of monthly surpluses were in the first half of 2001.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20trade-Mar12-687.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20trade-Mar12-687.html','popup','width=903,height=689,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20trade-Mar12-thumb-580x442-687.gif" width="580" height="442" alt="Intangibles trade-Mar12.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20and%20goods-Mar12-690.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20and%20goods-Mar12-690.html','popup','width=903,height=689,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Intangibles%20and%20goods-Mar12-thumb-580x442-690.gif" width="580" height="442" alt="Intangibles and goods-Mar12.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Oil%20good%20intangibles-Mar12-684.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Oil%20good%20intangibles-Mar12-684.html','popup','width=903,height=689,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Oil%20good%20intangibles-Mar12-thumb-580x442-684.gif" width="580" height="442" alt="Oil good intangibles-Mar12.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p>

<p><SPAN STYLE="line-height: 100%"><br />
Note: we define trade in intangibles as the sum of "royalties and license fees" and "other private services". The BEA/Census Bureau definitions of those categories are as follows:</SPAN><br />
<SPAN STYLE="line-height: 100%"><br />
Royalties and License Fees - Transactions with foreign residents involving intangible assets and proprietary rights, such as the use of patents, techniques, processes, formulas, designs, know-how, trademarks, copyrights, franchises, and manufacturing rights. The term "royalties" generally refers to payments for the utilization of copyrights or trademarks, and the term "license fees" generally refers to payments for the use of patents or industrial processes.</SPAN><br />
<SPAN STYLE="line-height: 100%"><br />
Other Private Services - Transactions with affiliated foreigners, for which no identification by type is available, and of transactions with unaffiliated foreigners. (The term "affiliated" refers to a direct investment relationship, which exists when a U.S. person has ownership or control, directly or indirectly, of 10 percent or more of a foreign business enterprise's voting securities or the equivalent, or when a foreign person has a similar interest in a U.S. enterprise.)  Transactions with unaffiliated foreigners consist of education services; financial services (includes commissions and other transactions fees associated with the purchase and sale of securities and noninterest income of banks, and excludes investment income); insurance services; telecommunications services (includes transmission services and value-added services); and business, professional, and technical services.  Included in the last group are advertising services; computer and data processing services; database and other information services; research, development, and testing services; management, consulting, and public relations services; legal services; construction, engineering, architectural, and mining services; industrial engineering services; installation, maintenance, and repair of equipment; and other services, including medical services and film and tape rentals.</SPAN><br />
<br /><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Talk on reinventing the research university</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/talk-on-reinventing-the-research-university.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4148</id>

    <published>2012-05-09T15:25:04Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-10T13:40:53Z</updated>

    <summary>Interesting talk by Jim Duderstadt, former president of the University of Michigan, at the April meeting of the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI). [Disclaimer: UM is my Alma Mater - both undergraduate and graduate.] [And spoiler alert: it gets really...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting talk by Jim Duderstadt,  former president of the University of Michigan, at the April meeting of the Coalition for Networked Information (CNI).  [Disclaimer: UM is my Alma Mater - both undergraduate and graduate.]  [And spoiler alert: it gets really interesting about half way through at minute 34 when he switches to the speculative longer term and larger view.]</p>

<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6OwrYZmaXBY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br><br />
<br></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Summarizing a complete innovation strategy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/summarizing-an-complete-innovation-strategy.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4140</id>

    <published>2012-05-09T15:13:33Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-09T15:21:55Z</updated>

    <summary>Earlier this year, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría gave a speech to the China Development Forum on &quot;Promoting Technological Innovation for New Sources of Growth.&quot; That talk essentially summarized the OECD&apos;s Innovation Strategy (see also earlier posting). What caught my eye...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year, OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría gave a speech to the China Development Forum on <a href="http://www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3746,en_21571361_44315115_49933468_1_1_1_1,00.html">"Promoting Technological Innovation for New Sources of Growth."</a>  That talk essentially summarized the <a href="http://www.oecd.org/pages/0,3417,en_41462537_41454856_1_1_1_1_1,00.html">OECD's Innovation Strategy</a> (see also <a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2010/06/economics-innovation-central-to-boosting-growth-an.html">earlier posting</a>).  What caught my eye was the following description of an expansive view of innovation:<blockquote>The Strategy goes beyond R&D to describe the broader context in which innovation occurs.  Let me briefly share with you some of its insights:</p>

<p>First, innovation is about extracting value from existing, traditional or emerging technologies to develop new services and business models. For example, the emergence of information and communications technologies (ICT) - like cloud computing - holds the promise of productivity gains. They help companies avoid heavy, upfront investments in IT infrastructure and staff in exchange for a sustainable, pay-as-you-go model, which can enable them to grow faster.</p>

<p>Second, knowledge assets - research, design, marketing, networks, software, data analytics - will increasingly drive growth and competitiveness. Today, companies often invest more in software alone than in machinery and equipment. According to sources in the car industry, these knowledge assets make up the majority of development costs for a new Volvo truck.</p>

<p>Other "intangible" elements, like design, branding and marketing, can also account for a huge share of a product's value-added. These are some of the reasons why the world buys Apple phones, Ikea furniture or Nespresso coffee. Smart companies know that, when they invest in intangibles, they can better capture value from global trade.</p>

<p>Third, innovation is a key pillar of green growth. It helps to decouple growth from natural capital depletion. It addresses knowledge gaps and fosters new technologies that can help the transition towards greener growth. It is absolutely central in enabling green and growth to go hand-in-hand.</p>

<p>Last, but not least, innovation depends on people: on their knowledge, creativity and skills. Your recently-launched human resources strategy acknowledges that a better educated workforce is critical to move up the global value chain, and to ensure a more inclusive economic and social progress for China's citizens.</blockquote></p>

<p>I think that covers a number of key points:  innovation is more that new tech and intangible play a big role.  I know the Chinese audience was paying attention to Gurría's comments.  I hope American policymakers were listening as well.<br><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Disney benefits from Marvel</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/disney-benefits-from-marvel.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4144</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T15:39:31Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T15:40:34Z</updated>

    <summary>Speaking of intangible assets, here is another story on company&apos;s assets -- this case, Disney and Marvel comics from the IP Value blog (&quot;Disney&apos;s release of Marvel&apos;s The Avengers will begin an informative case study on IP as a value-driver&quot;).With...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Speaking of intangible assets, here is another story on company's assets -- this case, Disney and Marvel comics from the IP Value blog ("<a href="http://www.ipvalue-site.com/index.php/2012/05/04/disneys-release-of-marvels-the-avengers-will-begin-an-informative-case-study-on-ip-as-a-value-driver">Disney's release of Marvel's The Avengers will begin an informative case study on IP as a value-driver</a>").<blockquote>With today's [Friday May 4th] U.S. introduction of the film, Marvel's The Avengers, we will see the Disney hydra-headed marketing machine in action.<br />
<blockquote>Tying the Marvel name to the movie title is working.  Almost all of the movie theaters and web move-time-listings services are adding the Marvel name to the title of the movie;<br />
Licensees are lining up, from the logical (Hasbro,) to the not-so-likely, Wyndham and Harley Davidson;<br />
Disney expects licensing revenues to exceed box-office revenues (a look into ktMINE, the license and royalty rate database, reveals 9 pre-Disney Marvel licensing agreements with an average royalty rate of a hefty 8.3% of net sales);<br />
International sales are expected to set records.</blockquote></blockquote>Disney paid $4.2 billion for Marvel.  We will see how quickly and much that investment pays off.  Already in its weekend debut, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/07/movies/marvels-the-avengers-top-box-office-record.html">film broke box office records</a> and is predicted to gross over $1 billion in global box office sales.  Disney clearly recognized that Marvel was an addition to its asset base that could be used to could be used to leverage its existing assets -- and be leveraged by them.<br />
<br /><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Facebook&apos;s intangible capital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/Facebook intangibles.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4143</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T15:23:41Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T15:26:13Z</updated>

    <summary>An interesting piece in the Financial Times (Lex in depth: Facebook) that, as its title implies, takes a close look at the upcoming Facebook IPO. The article raises a number of questions about the possible valuation of the company, based...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>An interesting piece in the <em>Financial Times</em> (<a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/8a21debe-944e-11e1-bb47-00144feab49a.html">Lex in depth: Facebook</a>) that, as its title implies, takes a close look at the upcoming Facebook IPO.  The article raises a number of questions about the possible valuation of the company, based on questions about the business model.  What it really raises are questions on Facebook's intangible capital:</p>

<p>Vulnerable strategic capital - in contrast to Microsoft and Google:<blockquote>It is hard to quit using Microsoft's software or Google's search engine, not just because of network effects but also because almost everyone needs to do things those tools make possible. Competitors are more expensive or not as good. Facebook simply is not essential to life or work in the same way.</blockquote></p>

<p>Vulnerable relational capital - based on the balancing act between customer wants and advertisers needs:<br />
<blockquote>Advertisers could end up offering stuff people actually want. And privacy protection features will be put in place. But the issue is whether what Facebook does to increase the value of the data it collects makes users enjoy Facebook less and use it less. Users might start to think they are the product not the customer. Not a fun feeling.<br />
The contrast with Google is striking. If Lex types "HP 12C calculator" into Google, it is setting itself up to see a certain kind of ad alongside search results. Indeed, users often have commercial intentions when they search. This is absolutely not the case on Facebook. And if the company cannot target ads without turning off users, revenue growth will slow, and soon.</blockquote></p>

<p>In other words, Google's strategic capital is grounded in the irreplaceable function of its product (i.e. the need for a search engine).  As long as its product continues to be the best in meeting that function, it has strong strategic capital.  Google's relational capital is based on the complementarity of user needs (i.e. customers and advertisers are using the product for similar purposes).  Facebook has neither of these strengths.<br />
<br><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Select Tweets 4/30/12-5/6/12</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/select-tweets-43012-5612.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4135</id>

    <published>2012-05-07T13:23:47Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-07T13:24:48Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[NY Times Disruptions: With No Revenue, an Illusion of Value bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/dis... Are VCs encouraging companies to not have revenues?&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) April 30, 2012 NY Times: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes nytimes.com/2012/04/29/bus... Lessons on how the international tax...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>NY Times Disruptions: With No Revenue, an Illusion of Value <a href="http://t.co/68rf64vx" title="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/disruptions-with-no-revenue-an-illusion-of-value/">bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/dis...</a> Are VCs encouraging companies to not have revenues?</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/196941723505659904" data-datetime="2012-04-30T12:39:00+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>NY Times: How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Taxes <a href="http://t.co/xxojxvRC" title="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/business/apples-tax-strategy-aims-at-low-tax-states-and-nations.html">nytimes.com/2012/04/29/bus...</a> Lessons on how the international tax system treats intangibles.</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/196965497768652800" data-datetime="2012-04-30T14:13:28+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Beyond "Imagine" - "yes, but . . ." - The Intangible Economy <a href="http://t.co/RFLt4GUe" title="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/beyond-imagine.html">athenaalliance.org/weblog/archive...</a> Book Imagine is a good read, but could have been more.</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/196986430877220864" data-datetime="2012-04-30T15:36:39+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>RT @<a href="https://twitter.com/ACabassu">ACabassu</a>: @<a href="https://twitter.com/maryadamsICA">maryadamsICA</a> A French open source methodology on intangible Capital measurement on L'observatoire de l'Immatériel website!</p>&mdash; Mary Adams (@maryadamsICA) <a href="https://twitter.com/maryadamsICA/status/196987839383216129" data-datetime="2012-04-30T15:42:15+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Negative rate short term Treasury Bills?What does that say about the fiscal reputation of the US government? <a href="http://t.co/q9GNkEnr" title="http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304811304577370341826605990.html?mod=djemTAR_t&amp;mg=reno-wsj#">professional.wsj.com/article/SB1000...</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197001753030430720" data-datetime="2012-04-30T16:37:32+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Money talks: Buying a house in America - The Economist <a href="http://t.co/KGHHXz1W" title="http://econ.st/IPGmNO">econ.st/IPGmNO</a> The Economist sees real estate agents as a transaction cost ...</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197023076779687936" data-datetime="2012-04-30T18:02:16+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>...not as part of a relational asset (maybe reason agent asks about your kids is about being close to a school?) <a href="http://t.co/KGHHXz1W" title="http://econ.st/IPGmNO">econ.st/IPGmNO</a> ...</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197023747914477569" data-datetime="2012-04-30T18:04:56+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>... of course that is not the way things are done in Britain <a href="http://t.co/KGHHXz1W" title="http://econ.st/IPGmNO">econ.st/IPGmNO</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197023954777554948" data-datetime="2012-04-30T18:05:46+00:00">April 30, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>@<a href="https://twitter.com/MikeNelson">MikeNelson</a>: Accountants in charge? @<a href="https://twitter.com/SAI">SAI</a>: IBM's Offer To Older Workers: <a href="http://t.co/lzbUYfy4" title="http://read.bi/IoNscr">read.bi/IoNscr</a> Disappointing if true: thought IBM understood</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197435562918035456" data-datetime="2012-05-01T21:21:21+00:00">May 1, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Transform Your Employees into Passionate Advocates - <a href="http://t.co/U2vZHQFZ" title="http://s.hbr.org/Iw9nSx">s.hbr.org/Iw9nSx</a> Tips on enhancing your key intangible asset: frontline workers</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197441058269962240" data-datetime="2012-05-01T21:43:11+00:00">May 1, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>IP Watch: Some Major Trading Partners Are Biggest IP Violators, USTR Says <a href="http://t.co/Ed1bEXcE" title="http://shar.es/2rj4y">shar.es/2rj4y</a> Two takes on watch list. Canada as bad guy?</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/197443683308679168" data-datetime="2012-05-01T21:53:37+00:00">May 1, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Interesting read...Capitalizing on Our Intellectual Capital - Harvard Business Review: <a href="http://t.co/ncJVwEeG" title="http://j.mp/IijZjh">j.mp/IijZjh</a></p>&mdash; Melanie Cohen (@DrMELonMGMT) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrMELonMGMT/status/197305638173413376" data-datetime="2012-05-01T12:45:04+00:00">May 1, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Pilot Institute on Additive Manufacturing is the first of the new National Network for Manufacturing Innovation centers <a href="http://t.co/EHes6ro4" title="http://manufacturing.gov/amp/news-050312.html">manufacturing.gov/amp/news-05031...</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198168853514166273" data-datetime="2012-05-03T21:55:11+00:00">May 3, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Government Is Pushing Full Speed Ahead On Additive Manufacturing <a href="http://t.co/EEctCSG1" title="http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/additivemanufacturing430121.html">manufacturingnews.com/news/additivem...</a> $45 million new pilot manufacturing center</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198062327420035072" data-datetime="2012-05-03T14:51:53+00:00">May 3, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Coller IP: IP Strategies in the Supply Chain <a href="http://t.co/zkrJWeyY" title="http://bit.ly/IIGtM8">bit.ly/IIGtM8</a> Tips on IP management, including "Consider all intangible assets"</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198039215794171904" data-datetime="2012-05-03T13:20:03+00:00">May 3, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>New Kauffman study: Number of New Firms Continues to Slide, According to New Census Bureau Data <a href="http://t.co/m2BhKow0" title="http://shar.es/2v3TK">shar.es/2v3TK</a></p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198029618710712320" data-datetime="2012-05-03T12:41:54+00:00">May 3, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Failed drugs to get another chance <a href="http://t.co/49fVAcXX" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/collaboration-seeks-to-find-new-uses-for-failed-drugs/2012/05/03/gIQAA81D0T_story.html">washingtonpost.com/national/healt...</a> NIH uses crowdsource for testing alternate uses of drugs - business model innovation</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198385648896442368" data-datetime="2012-05-04T12:16:39+00:00">May 4, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>State pension fund sues Wal-Mart leaders over Mexican bribery case <a href="http://t.co/qmCTJ4sb" title="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-walmart-calstrs-20120504,0,2979062.story">latimes.com/business/la-fi...</a> Is this really about loss of intangible: reputation?</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198406084573143040" data-datetime="2012-05-04T13:37:51+00:00">May 4, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Fed Register: Request for Information on National Network for Manufacturing Innovation proposal <a href="http://t.co/PHGjFQ54" title="http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-05-04/html/2012-10809.htm">gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2...</a> Looking for comments</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198512135771389952" data-datetime="2012-05-04T20:39:16+00:00">May 4, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>The Coming Prosperity in 3 minutes <a href="http://t.co/j5wxKX00" title="http://bit.ly/JkpRc6">bit.ly/JkpRc6</a></p>&mdash; Philip Auerswald (@auerswald) <a href="https://twitter.com/auerswald/status/198564087939084289" data-datetime="2012-05-05T00:05:42+00:00">May 5, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Renting Prosperity <a href="http://t.co/dKfkK4L7" title="http://on.wsj.com/J2Av7W">on.wsj.com/J2Av7W</a> Good take on shift of econmodel to rent from own in many areas (think Netflix and Zipcar).</p>&mdash; Ken Jarboe (@IntangibleEcon) <a href="https://twitter.com/IntangibleEcon/status/198759452072091648" data-datetime="2012-05-05T13:02:00+00:00">May 5, 2012</a></blockquote>
<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>April employment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/april-employment-2.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4141</id>

    <published>2012-05-04T12:56:53Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-04T13:02:06Z</updated>

    <summary>The BLS employment data for April is out and many will see it as a disappointment. Employment increased by 115,000 jobs while, once again, the unemployment rate dropped by 0.1% to 8.1%. Economists had expected up to 168,000 new jobs...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">The BLS employment data for April</a> is out and many will see it as a disappointment.  Employment increased by 115,000 jobs while, once again, the unemployment rate dropped by 0.1% to 8.1%.  <a href="http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304743704577383713904032818.html">Economists had expected</a> up to 168,000 new jobs (<a href="http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/05/03/lowered-expectations-on-the-jobs-report/">with some low predictions of 125,000 to 89,000)</a>.  April's job growth came closer to that figure if you count just private sector jobs, which grew by 130,000.  But continued government jobs cuts -- a lose of 15,000 jobs in April -- drove the total down.</p>

<p>In some good news, the jobs numbers for February and March were revised upwards.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, the number of involuntary underemployed increased, both the number of workers who could only find part time work and the number of individuals working part time because of slack work or unfavorable business conditions.  The biggest increase was with those who could only find part time work.  This may be a worrisome indicator that companies continue to be reluctant to hire full time workers.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Involuntaryunderemployed-0412-681.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Involuntaryunderemployed-0412-681.html','popup','width=902,height=689,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/assets_c/2012/05/Involuntaryunderemployed-0412-thumb-580x443-681.gif" width="580" height="443" alt="Involuntaryunderemployed-0412.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p>

<p><br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Anti-servitization</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/anti-servitization.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4139</id>

    <published>2012-05-03T12:22:48Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-03T12:31:37Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;ve write a lot about the fusion of manufacturing and services. In the most recent, I explicitly mention the concept of &quot;servitization&quot; -- where a company sells as product as part of a service. In many cases, this takes the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've write a lot about the fusion of manufacturing and services.  In <a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/the-future-of-manufacturing.html">the most recent</a>, I explicitly mention the concept of "servitization" -- where a company sells as product as part of a service.  In many cases, this takes the form of a after-sales service contract.  But here is the counter-case of a successful strategy that specifically eschews the servitization model, from a recent <em>Strategy+Business</em> article <a href="http://www.strategy-business.com/article/12204">"China's Mid-Market Innovators"</a>:<br />
<blockquote>China's rapid expansion of buildings and infrastructure has involved widespread subcontracting, with work on all sizable projects shared among a chain of hundreds or even thousands of small businesses. Most of these Chinese construction subcontractors think in the short term. They want equipment that is good enough to do the immediate job, and that will then be written off after five years or less. They are not interested in expensive, feature-rich products with a long life span supported by service contracts.<br />
This type of segment is hard to penetrate for non-Chinese heavy equipment manufacturers, such as Caterpillar (U.S.), Liebherr (Germany), and Komatsu (Japan). These manufacturers follow well-established business models with buyers who, supported by long-term financing, think on a 10- to 15-year time span. Equipment must both last a long time and have the service needed to keep it operating with as few interruptions as possible.<br />
Meanwhile, upstart construction equipment manufacturers have emerged to serve China's fragmented construction industry. They sell low-cost machines that typically do not get expensive servicing, but are replaced when they wear out. The manufacturers focus on only a small range of related products, and keep their prices ultracompetitive by restricting investment only to functions and features that are strictly needed. Their versions of multinational products might not pass muster in Canada or Denmark, but they are considered superior in China.</blockquote>Having said that however, the article hints that this "throw-away" strategy may be just an interim phase as they move into other markets:<blockquote>Already, some of these mid-market construction equipment companies are becoming global powerhouses. For example, Sany Heavy Industry Company -- founded in 1994 in Changsha, the capital city of Hunan province -- became the world's largest concrete pump manufacturer in 2009; its total revenues in 2010 approached $8 billion. In 2012, Sany announced that it would acquire the second-largest producer, the German company Putzmeister, and it has built plants in the U.S., Brazil, India, and Germany, as well as a major R&D center near Cologne. Other construction equipment manufacturers expanding outside China include ZoomLion (also based in Changsha), XCMG (a state-owned company headquartered in Xuzhou), and Shandong Heavy Industry Group. They all got their start by selling to China's fragmented construction industry.</blockquote>Even if the companies eventually abandon the throw-away strategy, its success in China raises an interesting point.  Will there always be a market for pure manufactured goods, not tied to services?  I think there will be.  After all, many people are happy to just buy a fire alarm/smoke detector without signing up for a security monitoring service.  We need to keep in mind that the I-Cubed Economy runs on multiple strategic models.  </p>

<p>What is common, however, is the role of intangibles.  Even pure manufacturing as an output requires intangibles as an input.  The reason why the Chinese equipment company strategy works is because they have a clear understanding of exactly what features their customers want -- and have the design and engineering capabilities to provide for that want.  It may not be a high value added product compared to some of their competitors.  But it is an appropriate value added product.  And getting to that point of being appropriate takes a lot of knowledge (intangibles) inputs.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Intangibles - like the brain - operate below the surface</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/05/intangibles---like-the-brain---operate-below-the-s.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4137</id>

    <published>2012-05-01T14:00:48Z</published>
    <updated>2012-05-01T14:06:41Z</updated>

    <summary>In yesterday&apos;s posting, I critiqued Imagine: How Creativity Works by Jonah Lehrer. One of my favorite parts of the book is a quote that comes not from the section of creativity and group interaction (as discussed in yesterday&apos;s posting). It...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/beyond-imagine.html">yesterday's posting</a>, I critiqued <a href="http://www.jonahlehrer.com/books/imagine/"><em>Imagine: How Creativity Works</em></a> by Jonah Lehrer.  One of my favorite parts of the book is a quote that comes not from the section of creativity and group interaction (as discussed in yesterday's posting). It comes from the first part of the book in the discussion of individual brain activity.  The quote is from neurologist Marcus Raichle about his studies of brain activity when the subjects were not engaged in active tasks (i.e. when they are daydreaming):<blockquote>"When you don't use a muscle, that muscle isn't doing much," Raichle says.  "But when your brain is supposedly doing nothing, it's really doing a tremendous amount."</blockquote>The same can be said for the intangible economy.  There is a lot going on even when it looks like nothing is happening.</p>

<p>This below the surface activity of intangibles is what makes understanding and measuring the intangible economy so hard.  A successful economic outcome in the industrial era was the production of X widgets.  That was later refined to X widgets of a high quality standard of Y.  Like a muscle, the economy was either producing or resting.  But in the intangible economy, like in the brain, things are happening that don't automatically translate into an immediately visible activity.  Relationships are forged or modified.  Structural capital is created.  Skills and knowledge are created -- including tacit knowledge being shared.  All of which will ultimately contribute to economic success.</p>

<p>Lehrer's book tells the story of how psychologists and neurologists are using new tools and techniques to understand the functioning of creativity and the hidden pathways of the brain.  Just as the neurologist seek to connect certain brain activity to certain outcomes, we need to connect the functioning of intangible assets to economic results.  To do so, we need to develop new tools and techniques (including both macro and micro economic statistics) to better look at the not-so-visible world of the intangible economy.<br />
<br></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Beyond &quot;Imagine&quot; - &quot;yes, but . . .&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/beyond-imagine.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4136</id>

    <published>2012-04-30T15:21:46Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-30T15:40:30Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;ve just finished Imagine: How Creativity Works by Jonah Lehrer and I have to agree with most of the reviews - it is a good read. One of the biggest insights being touted from the book is the need for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've just finished <a href="http://www.jonahlehrer.com/books/imagine/">Imagine: How Creativity Works</a> by Jonah Lehrer and I have to agree with most of the reviews - it is a good read.  One of the biggest insights being touted from the book is the need for interaction as the spark of creativity.  Everyone has the ability to be creative.  In part, we just need the right environment.  As something that is seen as counterintuitive, Lehrer trashes the use of brainstorming. As he noted in the Washington Post Outlook's 4th Annual Spring Cleaning -- "<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/brainstorming-an-idea-past-its-prime/2012/04/19/gIQAhKT5TT_story.html">Brainstorming: An idea past its prime</a>":<br />
<blockquote>The reason brainstorming isn't helpful goes back to Osborn's prohibition of criticism. Constructive criticism is an important element of group creativity.</blockquote>Interesting, since I had always thought that constructive criticism was part of the process: that the first stage in brainstorming was essentially free-association and the second stage was the more critical phase.  In the book, he describes this constructive criticism as "plussing" -- or "yes, but".  He notes that the constructive criticism is an essential part of the idea generation/free association phase not just the analytical phase.</p>

<p>Thus, in the spirit of plussing, let me add a couple of points.  On the group dynamics/idea creation phase, I wish he had looked more at the process of "design thinking."  As <a href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2010/09/is-design-think-about-design.html">I've noted before</a>, key to design thinking is to avoid the rush to judgment.  It is all too easy to let the "yes, but" process get away from the free association/idea generate phase into the narrowing down/critical analysis phase.  Thus, we may need to think more carefully at how to improve the process before we completely abandon brainstorming.  I can see a phalanx of executives latching on to the "brainstorming-is-bad" and rushing to a no holds barred "debate-and-dissent" model without embracing the "plussing-is-good" variation.  A detailed understanding of the design thinking approach would have been a helpful addition to the book.</p>

<p>My second "yes, but" point concerns the size of the group dynamics.  The book has a chapter on "The Power of Q".  Q in this case is the optimal number of connections for a creative team to work effectively.  It is the middle ground sweet-spot between too few connections to spark new thinking and too many that overwhelms the process.  Unfortunately, Lehrer seems to completely lose that insight in the next chapter on cities.  There is no Q sweet spot.  Rather, discussion is all about the superlinear growth model that implies more is always better.  And the reverse model is then discussed in passing for company size: smaller is always better.  Thus, the theories discussed in one chapter appear to be contradicted in another.  Some synthesis would have been a major insight at this point, rather than just a summary and repetition of other peoples' ideas.</p>

<p>My final note is one the weakness of the concluding chapter.  The discussion about Route 128 and Silicon Valley is a little old and doesn't capture all of the factors.  There is a good description of the knowledge flows in the Valley (which is far different from the intense urban environments discussed earlier) and a explicit critique of the existing patent system.  I have to point out the irony of criticizing the "abundance of vague patents" while basing much of his argument on studies that heavily utilize patents as a measure of creativity.  Such, unfortunately, continues to be the state of the art in innovation research where we know that patents are not necessarily a good measure but like the drunk under the light post, it is where the data is.</p>

<p>All in all, a good read.  But, as my last comment notes: yes, but more pulling of the strands together would have made this an even more powerful read. <br />
<br/></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Selected tweets - 4/22/12 - 4/29/12</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/selected-tweets---42212---42912.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4134</id>

    <published>2012-04-30T13:15:56Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-30T13:16:34Z</updated>

    <summary>Trying to keep up with all the articles and papers of interest is an impossible task. Trying to also share those with others is even more difficult. In the past I have attempted to simply list those papers I thought...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Trying to keep up with all the articles and papers of interest is an impossible task.  Trying to also share those with others is even more difficult.  In the past I have attempted to simply list those papers I thought of interest on this blog without much commentary.  But Twitter is has now evolved into a powerful tool for archiving and sharing links to articles and papers.  So I have taken to tweeting material @IntangibleEcon that I would have posted on this blog.  And I share blog postings by tweeting on them.  To complete the circle, however, I need to share tweets with the blog.  So, this week I am starting a new weekly blog posting of the selected tweets for the past week.  I will not be all of my tweets for the week (and will not contain the tweets of the previous blog postings -- that is too much like an infinite loop).  It will contain those links which I would have previously tried to post here - but now tweet.</p>

<p>So, here is the first installment:</p>

<p>Last week's selected tweets</p>

<p>27 Apr Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology <a href="http://shar.es/2mPLh">http://shar.es/2mPLh</a> Can we find the space between proprietary and open?</p>

<p>27 Apr Reclaiming the American Dream: Community Colleges and the Nation's Future <a href="http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/21stcenturyreport/index.html">http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/21stcenturyreport/index.html</a> Revitalize a key in human capital formation</p>

<p>27 Apr China Digs It <a href="http://fam.ag/I6xKAg">http://fam.ag/I6xKAg</a> via @ForeignAffairs How China's tech strategy and "rare earth" materials combine<br />
27 Apr And look esp. at photo of smelting lanthanum in Inner Mongolia. High tech material processed in pre-industrial fashion <a href="http://fam.ag/I6xKAg">http://fam.ag/I6xKAg</a></p>

<p>27 Apr How to replicate Silicon Valley in Washington <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/onsmallbusiness/to-replicate-silicon-valleys-success-focus-on-culture/2012/04/25/gIQAzFQkhT_story.html">http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/onsmallbusiness/to-replicate-silicon-valleys-success-focus-on-culture/2012/04/25/gIQAzFQkhT_story.html</a> Key intangible: relational capital!</p>

<p>27 Apr Take My BlackBerry--Please! <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/04/27/take-my-blackberryplease">http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2012/04/27/take-my-blackberryplease</a> First Palm then Blackberry; so how long with the iPhone's ride last?</p>

<p>27 Apr<br />
Publicizing science on the Hill "The Golden Goose Awards" <a href="http://wapo.st/Iqqlvi">http://wapo.st/Iqqlvi</a> Magic of science: you never know where it will lead . . .<br />
27 Apr <br />
... Even studies on the sex life of the screwworm: <a href="http://wapo.st/Iqqlvi">http://wapo.st/Iqqlvi</a></p>

<p>25 Apr  Stick to the Mail: Postal Reform Means Radical Cost Cutting, Not "Product Innovation" <a href="http://bit.ly/I627L1">http://bit.ly/I627L1</a> Disagree - USPS need to innovate</p>

<p>25 Apr RT @HarvardBiz - Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers <a href="http://s.hbr.org/Ik06aG">http://s.hbr.org/Ik06aG</a> Amount of effort customers make is key intangible, not extras.</p>

<p>25 Apr Crook: Conservatives Need Better Blueprint for New Economy <a href="http://bloom.bg/I9bLP4">http://bloom.bg/I9bLP4</a> "next economy is going to demand unaccustomed flexibility"</p>

<p>24 Apr Who Is America's Top Job Creator? The Globalist <a href="http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?storyid=9599">http://www.theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?storyid=9599</a> Answer: Al Gore as key facilitator of commercial use of the Internet.</p>

<p>24 Apr Vodafone bids for Cable & Wireless| The Economist <a href="http://econ.st/I6uFoT">http://econ.st/I6uFoT</a> Buying only parts of the intangibles: customer list not brand</p>

<p>24 Apr <br />
Tupac Hologram Rocks Coachella and IP Laws <a href="http://j.mp/J5h0z6">http://j.mp/J5h0z6</a> Article raises good point: who owns copyright of holographic performance.</p>

<p>23 Apr "@robatkinsonitif: Video up from ITIF's Innovation Consensus 2013 conference: <a href="http://bit.ly/I3Y8Nh">http://bit.ly/I3Y8Nh</a>" Great event esp. discuss on intangibles</p>

<p><br />
23 Apr Post Offices Face Hurdles in Efforts to Diversify <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/21/us/postal-service-seeks-to-widen-activities-and-revenue.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/21/us/postal-service-seeks-to-widen-activities-and-revenue.html</a> Reason why Post Office is a dinosaur -- Congress! Let USPS innovate!</p>

<p>23 Apr Business Etiquette: 5 Rules That Matter Now <a href="http://ti.me/JzpJXN">http://ti.me/JzpJXN</a> Relations are a big intangible asset: here are some rule to follow . . .<br />
23 Apr . . . especially the one about not talking business in the elevator, always surprises me - people have no clue as to who might be listening</p>

<p>23 Apr New breakthrough use of 3D printing? Drugs! <a href="http://bit.ly/Jo9vNO">http://bit.ly/Jo9vNO</a> Wow - that has all sorts of implications.</p>

<p>23 Apr Virginia Tech computers teach math: <a href="http://wapo.st/JjTutI">http://wapo.st/JjTutI</a> Successful machine-based education, is this the future?</p>

<p>22 Apr Classic case of building a new business on an intangible asset by selling what you know - NYTimes - Disney Institute: <a href="http://nyti.ms/JgvpGL">http://nyti.ms/JgvpGL</a></p>

<p><br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>1Q 2012 GDP</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/archives/2012/04/1q-2012-gdp.html" />
    <id>tag:www.athenaalliance.org,2012:/weblog//1.4132</id>

    <published>2012-04-27T13:45:24Z</published>
    <updated>2012-04-27T13:47:04Z</updated>

    <summary>BEA&apos;s advanced estimate on the 1st Quarter of 2012 is out and shows the economy grew by 2.2%. I should say &quot;only&quot; 2.2% since final number of 3% GDP growth in 4Q 2011. It is below the 2.6% economists had...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Jarboe</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.athenaalliance.org/weblog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/2012/pdf/gdp1q12_adv.pdf">BEA's advanced estimate on the 1st Quarter of 2012 is out and shows the economy grew by 2.2%</a>.  I should say "only" 2.2% since final number of 3% GDP growth in 4Q 2011.  It is below the 2.6% economists had expected, according to the <a href="http://professional.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304811304577369640809969900.html">Wall Street Journal</a>.  However, as the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/business/economy/us-economic-growth-slows-to-2-2-rate-report-says.html">New York Times</a> notes, it is "maintaining what many economists have started to call a "sustainable" pace of recovery."  And the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/growth-likely-dipped-in-january-march-quarter-but-outlook-for-all-of-2012-appears-brighter/2012/04/27/gIQAhrEekT_story.html">Washington Post</a> concludes the data on increased consumer spending "suggests that the economy will continue to expand, slowly but steadily."  </p>

<p>Declines in federal, state and local government spending continue to be a drag on GDP growth.  Another worrisome issues is the downward blip in nonresidential fixed investment (i.e. business spending).  Investment in nonresidential structures dropped by 12.0%.  Equipment and software increased by only 1.7% compared to an increase of 7.5% in the previous quarter.  And, as I have noted before, the data has a basic problem in that it does not give us any guidance on investment in intangibles other than software.  So we do not know whether companies have increased or decreased their investments in important areas such as human and organizational capital.</p>

<p>Note: these are advanced estimates subject to potentially large revisions.  The next revision will be released on May 31.<br />
<br /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>

