As expected, the Supreme Court ruled against Bilski, upholding the Appeals court that a patent must be tied to a particular machine or be transformative -- see the Court's "Slip Opinion" on the case and the Wall Street Journal story Supreme Court Rules Against Inventors in Patent Case. Expect a flood of ink over the next few days as everyone weights in on what this means. I will try to summarize later.
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.athenaalliance.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3211
Note: The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily those of Athena Alliance.
Click here to go to the Athena Alliance homepage.
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Ken Jarboe published on June 28, 2010 11:22 AM.
Robert C. Byrd was the previous entry in this blog.
SOX case decision -- also finally is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
September 2011
Recent Entries
- Calculating the value of a copyright
- August employment
- Solyndra -- who gets the IP?
- Technical difficulties with the blog - please stand by
- The case for manufacturing - and the need to understand the transformation
- Regulations as an innovation forcing function
- Bernanke on the near- and longer-term prospects for the U.S. economy
- End the Doha Round
- 2Q 2011 GDP revised downward
- Apple loses an intangible asset - maybe


Leave a comment