« FTC-DOJ second IP report | Main | Access to Knowledge conference »
April 18, 2007
Standard or IPR
The issue of a technical standard versus a patent has raised its head in the Verizon v Vonage case, according to this story from PC World (Validity of Verizon's VoIP Patents Challenged):
Two of the three Verizon patents a jury upheld in a March decision were described in a standards group called the VOIP Forum before Verizon filed for the patents, said Daniel Berninger, who had a hand in launching Vonage but now works as a telecom analyst for Tier1Research.com. The VOIP Forum described the name translation call-processing step in an open standard developed in 1996, and Verizon applied for the two patents in March 1997 and February 2000, he said in an interview about the case.
Verizon's patents focus on using name translation to connect VOIP calls to traditional telephone networks. But without name translation, no VOIP calls could be completed, and all Verizon VOIP competitors are in danger of getting sued, Berninger said. "If you translate these patents so ridiculously broadly, then there's nothing left," he said. "Everybody infringes."
And so it continues . . .
Posted by Ken Jarboe at April 18, 2007 11:16 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.athenaalliance.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1272