Building
on Local Information Assets
Kenan Patrick
Jarboe
Athena Alliance
(from Rural Matters,
Summer 2004)
Click here to
download a PDF
version of this report
You
don’t have the ability to read PDFs? Get Acrobat now by clicking
here.
Being rural can also be “cool.” As locally developed information
assets become the keys to economic success, rural areas need not be
left behind. All communities have the opportunity to benefit from
capturing and using their local knowledge. In this new age of information
and knowledge, rural areas can continue to thrive by being the special
places they are.
America
is in transition to an information economy. For our nation’s
rural areas, the challenge of this transformation is especially acute.
Too often left out of the economic mainstream, they are in danger
of becoming backwaters of the rapidly flowing changes all around them.
Yet, the opportunities for these areas are as real as the dangers.
The economic rules are changing; local information assets are becoming
an important factor in economic development. These changes can help
rural areas leap into the economic mainstream or can leave them further
isolated.
It is now a generally accepted principle in economic development that
communities should build on their strengths. Mapping of a community’s
assets is becoming a standard component of economic and community
development. But what are a community’s strengths in the global
information economy? How does a community discover, foster, develop
and use its local assets? Which assets are truly important in this
new economy?
Economic activity is no longer merely a process of combining capital,
energy, materials and labor. Growth in the industrial era was achieved
by a process that economists call capital deepening. Costs were driven
down by economies of scale; productivity increased through incremental
changes. In addition, new technological breakthroughs created new
products and entire new industries.
In the information economy, growth is achieved through relentless
innovation and the application of knowledge. Economists who have studied
this process (often called New Growth Theory) describe knowledge as
very different from other factors of production, like capital and
labor. Knowledge and information are what they call “non-rival,”
meaning that more than one person can use them at the same time. For
example, many people may be reading this article at the same time.
The ideas, concepts and information contained in this article can
be used in many communities simultaneously.
As a result, spillovers from knowledge make the accumulation of knowledge
self-perpetuating and not subject to diminishing returns. This is
unlike in the physical world where laws of energy and laws of economics
dictate diminishing rates of return on the use of labor and capital.
In other words, knowledge creates more knowledge which creates yet
more knowledge. It is the closest thing that we have to a perpetual
motion machine – a perpetual idea machine.
And it is not just technological advances. Knowledge and information
comes in many forms and can be used in many ways – such as expanding
consumer choice through more customized products, more individualized
service and greater attention to aesthetics in order to respond to
changing consumer tastes.
In the late 1990’s, Danny Quah of the London School of Economics
began talking about the “weightless economy” – a
phrase that Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan has used
repeatedly – to describe how more and more of our economic activity
has little or no physical manifestation. It is not just services,
but knowledge-based goods like software and music – so-called
“intangibles.” According to Leonard Nakamura of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, the value of US gross investments in
intangibles is over a trillion dollars annually. These intangibles
include R&D, advertising and marketing, software, financial activities
and creative activities of writers, artists and entertainers. In their
book, Invisible Advantage, management consultants Jonathan
Low and Pam Cohen Kalafut describe a set of intangibles that drive
business performance. Based on years of research, they documented
the importance of intangibles such as: organizational leadership;
technology and business processes; human capital; workplace organization
and culture; innovation capacity; intellectual capital; brands; reputation;
and alliances and networks.
Knowledge, information and intangibles drive our innovation process.
Not all innovation comes out of the research lab. In fact, creative
new design and new uses for old products are key parts of innovation.
Those ideas bubble up from customers and front-line workers as well
as from managers and researchers.
Thus, it is really a combination of factors that are powering this
new economy. It is an Information, Intangibles and Innovation Economy
(I3 or I-Cubed Economy).
Intangibles
cover not only what we normally think of as intellectual capital –
patents, copyrights etc. – but also tacit knowledge or know-how.
Explicit (or formalized) knowledge is the codified body of knowledge
that is captured in books, scientific formulas and blueprints; tacit
knowledge is that part of our knowledge base that is intuitive and
experiential. Both are needed. Formal knowledge provides the “know-what”
needed for technical progress. Tacit knowledge provides the “know-how”
to apply that formal knowledge. An expert is someone who knows not
only the formal knowledge of his or her field but also has the ability
to develop and utilize the relevant tacit knowledge – be it
a line worker in a paper mill, a brain surgeon or a computer software
developer.
In this I-Cubed Economy, local economic development requires identifying
and using these information and intangible assets, especially the
tacit knowledge imbedded in local worker experience. Tacit knowledge
is found in every situation and in every location. In international
development, such localized knowledge is often called “indigenous”
knowledge. The World Bank describes this as:
-
Local, in that it is rooted in a particular community and situated
within broader cultural traditions; it is a set of experiences generated
by people living in those communities.
-
Tacit
knowledge and, therefore, not easily codifiable.
-
Transmitted
orally, or through imitation and demonstration. Codifying it
may lead to the loss of some of its properties.
-
Experiential
rather than theoretical knowledge. Experience and trial and
error.
-
Learned
through repetition, which is a defining characteristic of tradition
even when new knowledge is added.
-
Constantly
changing, being produced as well as reproduced, discovered as
well as lost; though it is often perceived by external observers
as being somewhat static.
Tacit knowledge is only partially based in the individual; it also
resides in the special circumstances and situation of the community.
It has long been known that industries cluster together in certain
geographical areas. Economist have shown that this clustering effect
is due to more than simply location of physical resources. Sharing
of knowledge, especially tacit knowledge, is a key ingredient in
cluster formation. Tacit knowledge is “sticky” –
it is not highly mobile or easily transmitted over telecommunications
lines. There is the importance of “being there.” Thus,
place still matters in the information economy.
It is often thought that rural areas are at a distinct disadvantage
in this race to develop intangible assets. For example, it is difficult
for rural areas to put together the scientific and research assets
needed for technology-led economic development. Likewise, following
the notion of Richard Florida’s The Creative Class,
more and more urban areas have latched on to the notion that “cool”
is a defining intangible asset on which to build their economic
base. These assets are commonly seen as an active nightlife, arts
and entertainment centers that will attract young creative people.
Rural areas generally don’t have the agglomeration of such
features.
But recent studies show that rural areas and smaller communities
may be better suited to commercialization of new products (a specialized
form of “innovation”) rather than scientific and technical
innovation. And small-town and rural life styles have their own
appeal as “cool.” What sells is a unique or distinct
approach – that important intangible asset of “brand”
that more and more communities are beginning to recognize.
There are numerous examples of rural communities or regions that
have utilized local knowledge to spark development. The Appalachian
Center for Economic Networks (ACEnet) in Athena, Ohio has created
a local economic cluster centered on the specialty food products
industry. Other examples include film making around Wilmington,
NC; windsurfing-related sporting goods and apparel in Hood River,
Oregon; fishing gear in Woodland, Washington; snowmobile manufacturing
in northern Minnesota; and houseboat manufacturing in Kentucky.
These areas, and many others, show that it can be economically “cool”
to be rural.
|